Connect with like-minded education professionals and have your say on the issues that matter to you.
Don't forget to look at the how to guide.
Discussion in 'Personal' started by Duke of York, Oct 17, 2015.
That puts them off buying a drop of soap and water like the poor do?
I think it's the link to filthy lucre - it you've got it you must be contaminated by it.
Cos its the rich wot gets the pleasure, the poor wot gets the blame?
It's the same the whole world over!
Where there's muck there's brass.
And where there's dwarves, there's gold!
perhaps the pipes in those ancestral castles need replacing?
damnant quod non intellegunt
Where there is brass a foreign company has produced it
Do you remember Thomas Boltons, in Oakamoor? Copper/Brass tubes and bi-metal strip, all gone now, they were there for well over 100 years. No doubt similar companies now gone in many areas.
loss making companies often do and always have.
Strategically important Industries need to be protected or we will end up as a nation dependent on others. We are there now, I hope the bean counters are first in the line when the crunch comes.
But you need someone to do simple addition, no?
What does that mean in practice? The state covers their losses? Makes up their pension deficit? Companies go bust because the cannot pay their creditors, hmrc, employees and suppliers.
The MoS today had a mention of Tony Blair ignoring the tariffs that the USA placed on British steel at the time Tony was wetting himself to go to war for George W Bush.
What it means in practice is you cannot have security and independence on the cheap or at someone else's whim/fancy. The bean counters have not reached that conclusion yet, nor will they until it is too late. Which it already is btw.
So you advocate state subsidy of all loss making companies that you consider important for independence and security?
Your disdain suggests you consider financial management unimportant.
YES where it is necessary and your disdain of our manufacturing industry is symptomatic of how we are in the world today. Pandering to China, Saudi and the like for business.
Not at all, it is the overarching importance given to it along with the lies perpetrated by our masters (political mainly) on their alter that I disdain. Bottom line figures always omit the social and strategic costs resulting from such narrow views.
The necessary can be extensive. I don;t think it viable to pay subsidies year on year to shipbuilding, steel making, aircraft manufacture etc etc. Indeed, with guaranteed subsidies there is little incentive to run a business profitably,
Bottom line figures are reality. f business are to be the vehicle to reduce social and strategic costs than they will require state subsidy e.g if you want to manufacture a product (or provide a service) at a loss for social/strategic reasons, the state must cover the loss.
That would depend on how the enterprise was managed. We currently have a political class (and Civil Service) that has little to no imagination other than the status-quo.
YES if necessary, Germany, Japan, USA, France, Italy all do it.