Connect with like-minded education professionals and have your say on the issues that matter to you.
Don't forget to look at the how to guide.
Discussion in 'Science' started by Newstein, Jan 17, 2019.
If x = (10.0 +- 0.1) cm, 1/x = (0.10 +- ?)
As a scientist, I'd look at it like this:
1/10.1 = 0.099 and 1/9.9 = 0.101
Both of these are 0.001 away from your value for 1/10 so that's what I'd give for the uncertainty.
Another way of looking at it in science wouold be to say the original uncertainty as a % is 0.1/10 which is 1%, so we'd expect an uncertainty of 1% on the answer as well, which is what 0.001 out of 0.1 would give.
This might not be mathematically rigourous, i don't know, but it's what we'd do in a lab. I think.
Sparkleghirl's analysis seems perfect to me.
Yes - also if we use fractions as exact values, then the mid-point for the range of 1/x would strictly be 1000/9999 or 0.100010001.... rather than 0.1, but that's probably nit-picking.
I just did exactly this on a post it note - inverse propagation of uncertainty i think
Take a micrometer reading like x = (0.10 +- 0.01) cm. The uncertainty in 1/x then is
(1/2) (1/0.09 minus 1/0.11 ) = 1.02 cm^-1
Well, I have to accept this as well.
It transpires that x and 1/x have the same % uncertainty.