1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Hi Guest, welcome to the TES Community!

    Connect with like-minded education professionals and have your say on the issues that matter to you.

    Don't forget to look at the how to guide.

    Dismiss Notice

Science PiXL conference

Discussion in 'Science' started by excess, Dec 5, 2018.

  1. excess

    excess New commenter

    I attended the science PiXL conference today.
     
  2. lrcathcart

    lrcathcart New commenter

    Any news that you care to share?
     
  3. blazer

    blazer Star commenter

    Why wasn't it a virtual conference. I assume from the name it has something to do with IT?
     
  4. CheeseMongler

    CheeseMongler Lead commenter

    Not specifically IT. From my experience, PiXL are chief snake oil salespeople; schools and HTs have to sign up (and presumably pay) to join the PiXL "consortium" which entitles them to access some PiXL resources and attend "conferences" at London Whitehall. The resources are equivalent to one author's TES resources (so really dependent on whether that subject specialist's style suits you) and the conferences just seem to be a way of spreading management speak and new acronyms; mock exams have become PPEs (pre-public examinations) specifications have become PLCs (personalised learning checklists) and revision is DTT (diagnosis, therapy, testing). Don't think I learned anything else form the one I attended.
    My analogy is that PiXL are like a MAT that can't be bothered with actually taking responsibility for a school. They'll reinvent the wheel a couple of times and plaster it with management speak to try and hide the fact that they've increased your workload by asking you to do something that you already do.
     
    citct likes this.
  5. ScienceGuy

    ScienceGuy Established commenter

    PiXL has its fans as well as its critics. Certainly, when it was first set it up, it would advise schools on ways to boost their position in their league tables including mass entry in BTEC Science, multiple entries for English and Maths GCSEs and switching students to take IGCSE English.
     
  6. averagedan

    averagedan Established commenter

    PiXL are like most things in the educational world - you need to take what works for you and run with it. There are as many different styles of teaching as there are teachers. Generally I've found their stuff to be pretty good/worthy of adapting to match how I teach.
     
  7. excess

    excess New commenter

    Averagedan hits the nail on its head.
    Take what you like, tweak what you can and leave the rest.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2018
  8. excess

    excess New commenter

    However, they couldn't answer the question about allowing grade 3 or 3-3 in 2019 exam results.
    It would depend on how many will end up on a U. They did recommend though, to enter your 5-5 for foundation.
     
  9. ScienceGuy

    ScienceGuy Established commenter

    There will be a grade 3 for Triple (this was planned for last year regardless of how the entries work). There are no current plans for a grade 3-3 on Combined and it is unlikely that OfQual will allow the extra grade being added following the results.
     
  10. rich_hodgetts

    rich_hodgetts New commenter

    ScienceGuy - have you got a source for the information regarding it being unlikely there will be a 3-3 on the 2019 HT Science exams?

    Thanks
     
  11. rich_hodgetts

    rich_hodgetts New commenter

    Another positive vote for PiXL from me. I have been to the last 5 Science conferences and always bring back something useful. In the early days they were all about ways to make entry decisions work in schools advantage however as this is now mostly not possible, it has become far more about getting results out of students. Its usually nothing particularly groundbreaking but the resources they produce are generally good and are often useful as is. It would only be snake oil if their strategies didn't work - our Maths results would suggest that this is not the case!

    At the last conference there were over 1000 Science teachers in attendance - that is a lot of schools represented. It makes exam boards and publishers listen and in my experience has been a force for good.
     

Share This Page