1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Hi Guest, welcome to the TES Community!

    Connect with like-minded education professionals and have your say on the issues that matter to you.

    Don't forget to look at the how to guide.

    Dismiss Notice

Priti Patel: Bullying claims from time at DfID revealed

Discussion in 'Personal' started by chelsea2, Mar 4, 2020.

  1. alex_teccy

    alex_teccy Star commenter

    I’m not the one making the claim. As you can see from my last post I’ve supplied links to a study.
     
    Kandahar likes this.
  2. ilovesooty

    ilovesooty Star commenter

    Fancy responding to my point? Shouldn't be too arduous.
     
  3. ajrowing

    ajrowing Lead commenter

    I'm not one making claims about CSRs, and yet someone kept wanting me to supply evidence about them. Go figure.
     
  4. ilovesooty

    ilovesooty Star commenter


    Too difficult for you?
     
  5. ajrowing

    ajrowing Lead commenter

    Too difficult.
     
  6. chelsea2

    chelsea2 Star commenter

    So what is racist, sexist or envious about that comment?
     
  7. alex_teccy

    alex_teccy Star commenter

    That’s right, they’re both examples of worse-case archetypes.
    Read the excerpt again, because what it says is that deploying one archetype i.e the TF is regarded as stigmatising- which is what you correctly agreed with.
    The other, TM is socially acceptable in your construct of a “patriarchal socialisation” paradigm.

    When you say ideals exist in men’s heads and not in women’s you’re criticising men for being men, because you are making a generalisation about male traits that you claim cannot exist (ie behaviour is only environmental or “socially constructed) but must exist in order for your paradigm to opperate.
     
    Kandahar likes this.
  8. alex_teccy

    alex_teccy Star commenter

    I’m sorry, did you address a point to me?
     
  9. ilovesooty

    ilovesooty Star commenter


    Evidently. Not too good at addressing misogyny, hypocrisy and stereotyping when he's given an example of it.
     
  10. alex_teccy

    alex_teccy Star commenter

    CSRs are freely available on the EU website. I’ve quoted from them frequently and supplied the links on every occasion.
     
    Kandahar likes this.
  11. ilovesooty

    ilovesooty Star commenter

    I did wonder whether you'd care to address a point I made, yes.
     
  12. Orkrider2

    Orkrider2 Star commenter

    no, I was responding to you saying this
     
  13. Kandahar

    Kandahar Star commenter

    Try reading between the lines. Why else hold such vitriol for someone you have not met? The depth of contempt expressed by numerous posters cannont simply be put down to her dress sense.

    I assume that you and other haters of Mrs Patel condone it, along with the numerous other posts similar in style.
     
  14. ilovesooty

    ilovesooty Star commenter

    Post 136 if you're looking for it.
     
  15. alex_teccy

    alex_teccy Star commenter

    Give one example on this thread.
     
  16. ilovesooty

    ilovesooty Star commenter

    I couldn't give a stuff about her dress sense. Why should I? I have other reasons not to care much for her. Typical of your attitude to refer to it though.
     
  17. alex_teccy

    alex_teccy Star commenter

    I did not say it, I was quoting from an article to which I provided the link.
    You’re interested in this topic read the whole thing, it’s a great article.
     
  18. ilovesooty

    ilovesooty Star commenter

    Try addressing post 136.
     
  19. alex_teccy

    alex_teccy Star commenter

    Which point?
     
  20. chelsea2

    chelsea2 Star commenter

    No - because it's not sexist.

    Maybe people dislike the way she appears to do the job?
    Which is what this thread is ALL about - is her alleged behaviour bullying or harrassment?
    Why do you keep trying to make it about something else?
     
    ilovesooty likes this.

Share This Page