We too have had a nightmare with our January results, though with the Information and Ideas unit. We only entered our more able students, expecting at least 70% A*-C and ended up with less than half that. What's worst are the bizarre discrepancies between higher and foundation tier results, which suggested our most able students within the cohort were weaker than a large number of our foundation tier students. Students predicted A grades have attained D/Es. I can only echo what Markuss has written. Paul Dodd has so far been sympathetic and helpful, stating both of Markuss's points above, but this doesn't resolve a very concerning issue. We have requested a remark for some students and are awaiting the outcome before deciding how to proceed.