Connect with like-minded education professionals and have your say on the issues that matter to you.
Don't forget to look at the how to guide.
Discussion in 'Personal' started by Morninglover, Feb 16, 2020.
A government advisor who supports eugenics. How the government responds to this will be telling.
Birth control for who? Oh yes, women.
Considering he thinks that efforts to protect girls in the UK from FGM is a just a fuss over nothing, and women's sport is more akin to the paralympics than men's sport, and holds onto the outdated idea that black people are intellectually inferior, are we really surprised this racist misogynist would think nothing of removing bodily autonomy for women.
I see what you did there and it was a masterclass in deflection.
Take a little bit of the story which might be used to trash talk Labour and turn the story from a criticism of the Governments' SPADs into one of Labour party potential leaders.
Please can someone ask him what he feels about the actual story at hand rather than the distraction and deflection?
Not just women- I doubt it relates to the overclass, and the nice middle classes only ever have a reasonable number-
What birth control would be given to men?
This self-promoting, privileged pipsqueak would be of no conseqence whatever if he hadn't been enough of a misfit to please the delightful mr cummings.
A temporary snip to last for at least 18 years from the onset of puberty?
Actually, as a devout anglo-catholic, mr sabisky should deplore the inevitable rise in promiscuity and STDs his idea, if implemented, would lead to!
"One way to get around problems of unplanned pregnances creating a permanent underclass would be to legally enforce universal uptake of long-term contraception at the onset of puberty," he wrote.
I don't think condoms were what he meant when he spoke of long-term contraception that is to be enforced at the onset of puberty, do you?
Some men would just be pleased that it'd mean there was no further risk of physical evidence of their sexual liaisons in the form of a child.
If it's true that other advisors and government ministers are refusing to work with Sabisky, and are boycotting his meetings, I can't see him lasting long - especially as he is apparently not even a SpAD. I believe he is an educational psychologist who has been contracted to advise on a particular (unidentified) project.
Perhaps the our Govt could do similar to the Indian Govt, in the 60s and 70s, bribe people to be sterilized; 'get your vasectomy today and receive a free transistor radio'.
Such pronouncements by people in our supposed 'government' would be hilarious, if they were not sinisterly frightening.
And some young girls too, I suppose, orkrider.
All in all, given that these remarks were made a few years ago (sabisky is now 27) they can be dismissed as the ramblings of a callow youth.
I meant it's more specific than just birth control for women... it's birth control from a certain class.
See if you can spot the difference between the two families.
Both have an address on an estate, but often go and stay with relatives or at a different adress, neither have parents working regular hours, both have recently had child number 3, The man of the house passed through a succession of schools then went into the forces.
Family a- parents are called Ryan and Chentelle
Family b- parents are called HRH William and Kate.
Were they both to be discovered to have number four on the way- which do you think would be joyous front page headlines and which would have Johnson & co bemoaning lack of birth control.
BTW- how many does Johnson have? And by how many partners?
You are taking the thinking at least one step further than they are.
he's not really anything to do with the government, oh no no no …
Quick everyone - look over there!
How do you mean? I see it as seeing the bigger picture.
I always suspected that the Tories held deep seated hatred of teachers. But want to eliminate the supply of children to destroy the teaching profession is rather terrible.
Sabisky was mostly home-educated, wirh a few forays into private schools. His dad works for
As for not lettimg him speak, I totally disagree. Let him open his misfit mouth as wide as he likes and stand condemned by his own stupid words.
I see Johnson is making a bad situation worse by refusing to say he doesn't agree with eugenics and refusing to disagree that black people have lower IQs than white people.
Downing St refuses to say if Boris Johnson agrees with adviser who suggested black people are mentally inferior and backed compulsory contraception
I'd like to thank everyone who voted for these absolute clowns. Well done you. Who'd have thought Johnson and co. were people like this?