Yes I'm in the same boat as you folks - written work marks altered by between 3 and 6 for unit 2 and 1 and 3 for unit 1 (what's the point of moving a mark by 1!?) We've also had some horrible marks for our unit 3 work. A pretty average piece which - by my own admittance - wasn't terribly strong and I judged - on the basis of pervious years - to have gained the candidates C or D ish garnered an E and F and two Gs - marks like 20/80!! All I can say is that if the marks were right this year then they were completely wrong last year. I share the kind of impotent rage I'm seeing on here. It's the level of contempt in the moderator's report (going back to units 1 and 2) that I object to. Telling me that the work is generalised and not analytical is a frankly generalised and unanalytical remark. I feel like coming up with a centre's report to the moderator. Something along the lines of "The Moderator is reminded that the centre presents work in good faith and that criticsms would do well to be expressed within the context of appreciation. " How about it folks? Shall we all send our moderators a centre report!!?