You are the typical undereducated **** found in this sector, Witchy. Perhaps you and Sixth Form fascist are out the same limited mould? This is fascistis' statement from the other thread: " As a 'professional' in the sector, how is it that I am ignorant of the most important policy initiative to impact on the sector for 75 years?" Where does it mention LSC funding? Where does it talk about the things you mention 60% or 40%. If you cannot prepare a riposte without stoopping so low, I am very glad you don't work with me. I still, to get back to the point, do not see how the imposition of an unwanted body on people who do not want to be members, in a "sector" which does not fit together into a coordinated whole, will serve any purpose. And, if you can read, you might note that most of the posts written about the IfL (on several threads)actually put forward the same idea: that the IfL is unwanted, not required, pointless, and offers no possible positive benefits for any individual. If the IfL was so flaming wonderful everyone would have joined when it was a "voluntary" body.