1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Hi Guest, welcome to the TES Community!

    Connect with like-minded education professionals and have your say on the issues that matter to you.

    Don't forget to look at the how to guide.

    Dismiss Notice

If children don't read

Discussion in 'English' started by mashabell, Apr 29, 2011.

  1. In his piece 'Writing's on the wall if children don't read' in today's TES Geoff Barton asks,
    “Why would we in the literacy club want to keep our poorest children on the outside?”
    I replied as follows.

    The inconsistencies of English spelling are an extremely effective means of ensuring that children of poorly educated parents who are unable to assist their children’s speech development and cannot help them with learning to read - because they cannot read themselves or work long or unsociable hours - leave compulsory schooling nearly as ignorant as when they entered it. That’s why the majority of educated people abhor the idea of spelling reform. They like the advantages they guarantee for their children.
    Phonic inconsistencies like ‘on – only, once, other’, ‘paid – said’ and ‘sound – soup’ ensure that only children who get regular help with reading at home manage to learn this skill fairly easily. The rest, face a an enormous challenge and are unlikely to ever become avid readers. The long time it takes to learn to read English without help at home is enough to prevent most disadvantaged pupils from ever getting to like it.
    If we cannot bring ourselves to make English spelling more child-friendly - and learning to read less dependent on regular help from literate adults - there is only one other way of helping our poorest children to become more avid readers: give them the kind of consistent, long-term support that middle class parents give their children, not just in the early years but throughout their school days.
    This can only be achieved with very substantial increases in educational expenditure.
    Amending at least some of the most damaging of the 69 spellings which have more than one sound - http://englishspellingproblems.blogspot.com/2009/12/reading-problems.html -
    would be a cheaper, more certain and longer lasting way of ensuring this.

  2. Masha, do you ever post anything which doesn´t recommend your own website or blog?
    Just asking...
  3. I can't, because the only other person who did such a detailed analysis of English reading and spelling problems was the late Edward Carney. His 'Survey of English Spelling' (1994) costs £ 95.- and is not available online.
    What I have tried to do is make the same information more accessible and available for free.

  4. What absolute nonsense! There are hundreds of books available on the subject and countless websites.
  5. I do indeed. Fingers typed the wrong spelling.
  6. GloriaSunshine

    GloriaSunshine New commenter

    Yes, why is that? I expect it from my bottom sets but not on here.
  7. It is because Masha does not think that English (sorry, Inglish) should be so complicated. On the basis that the personal pronoun for self is just the letter I, she believes that you should be written U.
    My bottom sets don't do that, and I certainly don't find it acceptable on this forum, but Masha says that 'the likes of you' have got it all wrong.

Share This Page