1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Hi Guest, welcome to the TES Community!

    Connect with like-minded professionals and have your say on the issues that matter to you.

    Don't forget to look at the how to guide.

    Dismiss Notice
  3. The Teacher Q&A will be closing soon.

    If you have any information that you would like to keep or refer to in the future please can you copy and paste the information to a format suitable for you to save or take screen shots of the questions and responses you are interested in.

    Don’t forget you can still use the rest of the forums on theTes Community to post questions and get the advice, help and support you require from your peers for all your teaching needs.

    Dismiss Notice

Common Browsers & Resolutions.

Discussion in 'Computing and ICT' started by jweb2k, Jul 7, 2011.

  1. Same.
  2. JaquesJaquesLiverot

    JaquesJaquesLiverot Established commenter

    How did "widescreen" monitors become so popular? Aren't more documents taller than they are wide? To me, "wide" is a euphemism for "short", meaning endless scrolling up and down.
    I'm guessing this question has something to do with web-pages, as you're asking about browsers. As someone who maintains both our service web-site and a site of my own, I found the change from IE8 to IE9 to be the most tricky to accomodate so far. It used to be that it was Opera or Firefox caused most problems, but now, IE9 and current and previous versions of Firefox, Opera, Safari and Chrome all behave pretty consistently - and then you find that your site doesn't work in IE8.
  3. It's Javascript stuff so I'm hitting a much smaller target. Thanks to everyone who replied :)

  4. I believe 900 > 768
    and that 16:9 is scientifically proven to be more pleasing to the eye...
    No resolutions but http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2011/07/june-browser-stats-rapid-release-edition.ars
    breaks down world wide brower share monthly in pretty graphics...
  5. JaquesJaquesLiverot

    JaquesJaquesLiverot Established commenter

    I know it is. ;-)
    I believe that 16:9 was adopted for television because it's the same shape as the visual field. However, people don't need to scroll through web-pages or edit A4 documents on a television. Traditionally, PC monitors have been 4:3 (mine is 1280 x 960), which I think is better suited to most computer applications.
  6. I prefer 16:9 with a swivel function. Best of both worlds.
  7. agreed, 16:9 either way allows the golden ratio and even wide makes design for 4:3 easier, otherwise where are your panels going?


Share This Page