Connect with like-minded education professionals and have your say on the issues that matter to you.
Don't forget to look at the how to guide.
Discussion in 'Personal' started by lexus300, Mar 19, 2019.
I can tentatively agree but at what point or upper limit?
And fairies live at the bottom of your garden?
You say there is warming.
This previous cause-celebre of the deniers was debunked at least 10 years ago as being regional and not global, but here it is again being dragged up as "proof".
You're as plausible as someone walking round with a sandwich board telling everyone about the upcoming rapture.
It is thought that between c. 950 and c. 1100 was the Northern Hemisphere's warmest period since the Roman Warm Period. It was only in the 20th and 21st centuries that the Northern Hemisphere experienced warmer temperatures.
The last sentence there.
No, you just need to understand the basic physics and chemistry of it, which the world's scientists do. This was known over 100 years ago.
You are a fanatic bound only by the dogma of AGW., it is pointless talking to you on this matter.
Warming commenced 300 years ago and our own records show this quite clearly.
Like another you are simply hidebound by AGW dogma, there is no point in discussing this with you I have read both sides and there has been widespread fraud and disinformation on AGW.
No there hasn't - you are just very dim.
Why don't you watch that nice Mr Attenborough's program tonight at 9 pm - you might learn something.
Why do you think NASA, MIT et al are manipulating the results when, I bet, you will accept their conclusions in every other field of scientifc research, using much the same modelling methods? Your emotional attachment to anti-AGW 'dogma' is irrational.
Back into the echo chamber and spending your days on youtube then.
Those will be readings from a very few, badly sited, fraudulently manipulated thermometers? We few, we happy few, we band of thermometers?
My point is that the Medieval Warm period has been surpassed.
I intend to, it should be quite interesting especially when he starts to reiterate the AGW dogma.
Carry on with your pseudoscience and AGW propoganda it will be seen for what it is in the fullness of time. The world will still be here and humans will as well despite your best efforts to return us to pre-industrial living.
Satellite measured 'actual' temperatures are way below the modelling predictions so how is that Sherlock? You carry on with your predictions/estimates/models/guestimates if that is how you like to operate.
Either NASA/MIT forgot to ‘falsify’ the data collected by the satellites before they were published or your (or more likely a paid shrill) interpretation is wrong.
I doubt the former and see a lot of evidence for the latter.
The world and humans are still here after two world wars, best if they hadn't happened though eh? Likewise the Black Death.
Pre-industrial? Like electric cars? Solar, wind, tidal etc. energy? It's recent industrial technologies that will get us away from fossil fuel use and possibly CO2 sequestration that will address the problem. Your sound bite is meaningless.